Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF
#2
[quote name='IanCD' timestamp='1305755685' post='8554']

I hadn't realised the aperture was subject to a multiple (or rather, division) as well...

[/quote]



Not the aperture itself, of course. It stays the same physically and in terms of metering. However, the depth of field is affected. A 85/1.8 lens on DX gives roughly the same depth of field (in the final image) as a 135/2.8 lens on FX.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Messages In This Thread
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by IanCD - 05-18-2011, 09:54 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by mst - 05-18-2011, 10:15 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by IanCD - 05-18-2011, 10:19 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by mst - 05-18-2011, 10:50 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-18-2011, 11:26 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 01:20 AM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 07:26 AM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 08:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)