Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF
#3
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1305756934' post='8559']

Not the aperture itself, of course. It stays the same physically and in terms of metering. However, the depth of field is affected. A 85/1.8 lens on DX gives roughly the same depth of field (in the final image) as a 135/2.8 lens on FX.



-- Markus

[/quote]

Thanks Markus,

So that's about 2 stops (does it stay more or less constant?)

Which would have a detrimental impact on (shallow) DoF except that DoF gets shallower with increased focal length... so do the effects cancel each other out..?
  


Messages In This Thread
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by IanCD - 05-18-2011, 09:54 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by mst - 05-18-2011, 10:15 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by IanCD - 05-18-2011, 10:19 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by mst - 05-18-2011, 10:50 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-18-2011, 11:26 PM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 01:20 AM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 07:26 AM
Focal Length equivalence: DX to FF - by Guest - 05-19-2011, 08:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)