05-14-2011, 11:34 AM
[quote name='gunnar' timestamp='1305371470' post='8317']
Yes I'm aware that EF-S lenses are not FF compatible. As for 50/1.8 vs 28/1.8, I've read a number of tests and reviews (PZ included) and they all show that 28/1.8's only strong feature is it's large 1.8 aperture...
Anyway, thank you for input!
[/quote]
And yet, most 28mm f1.8 users swear by that little lens. Sometimes there is a disconnect between reviews based on measurements and actual use of the lens...
Pixel peeper can be of help, to determining the character of a lens (on FF, APS-C, or both):
http://www.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=37
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showp...t=2&page=2
Yes I'm aware that EF-S lenses are not FF compatible. As for 50/1.8 vs 28/1.8, I've read a number of tests and reviews (PZ included) and they all show that 28/1.8's only strong feature is it's large 1.8 aperture...
Anyway, thank you for input!
[/quote]
And yet, most 28mm f1.8 users swear by that little lens. Sometimes there is a disconnect between reviews based on measurements and actual use of the lens...
Pixel peeper can be of help, to determining the character of a lens (on FF, APS-C, or both):
http://www.pixel-peeper.com/lenses/?lens=37
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showp...t=2&page=2