Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Equiv. max. f-stops
#2
Yes, technically you're, of course, correct.

It's already a difficult topic so we decided to do it the simple way because it is more widely known that you loose about a stop.



cheers



Klaus

[quote name='jtra' timestamp='1300989287' post='7079']

Thank you Photozone for starting to include "Equiv. max. f-stops" in the reviews.



It brings attention to the fact that it is misleading to specify equivalent focal length along with non-equivalent relative apertures (thus breaking simple proportion: ApertureDiameter = FocalLength / FNumber). It is great that you specify both.



In recent Nikon 18-55vr review:

[indent]Equiv. focal length: 27-82.5 mm (full format equivalent)

Equiv. max. f-stops: f/5.0-8.0 (full format equivalent, in terms of depth-of-field - not speed)

[/indent]



Only slight detail: values should be f/5.3-8.5 since crop factor for Nikon DX cameras is 1.52, not 1.4.



It could be also improved by linking to this excellent article (or write some shorter explanation on your site): [url="http://www.josephjamesphotography.com/equivalence/"]http://www.josephjam...om/equivalence/[/url]

[/quote]
  


Messages In This Thread
Equiv. max. f-stops - by Guest - 03-24-2011, 05:54 PM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by Klaus - 03-25-2011, 06:47 PM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by wim - 03-25-2011, 11:08 PM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by miro - 03-26-2011, 12:09 AM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by Guest - 03-26-2011, 10:45 AM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by miro - 03-26-2011, 11:26 AM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by Guest - 03-26-2011, 12:25 PM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by Brightcolours - 03-26-2011, 01:07 PM
Equiv. max. f-stops - by wim - 03-26-2011, 10:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)