03-24-2011, 12:25 PM
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1300967692' post='7069']
I'm wondering how many of the 24-70 are actually used on FF.
28-85 seems a more interesting range to me.
[/quote]
Almost all 24-70's are used on full frame, especially the Nikon one. The Canon 24-70mm was used quite a bit too on 20/30D's before the 5D came along, and of course on the 1.3x APS-H 1D series.
I can not imagine anyone buying a 24-70 from Zeiss and not having a A900 or A850 either...
The Canon and Nikon 24-70 f2.8 are quite high volume lenses too. Not so strange, they are just standard zooms. The equivalent of the 17/18-50mm f2.8's on APS-C (well, equivalent focal range wise of course... not aperture wise).
I'm wondering how many of the 24-70 are actually used on FF.
28-85 seems a more interesting range to me.
[/quote]
Almost all 24-70's are used on full frame, especially the Nikon one. The Canon 24-70mm was used quite a bit too on 20/30D's before the 5D came along, and of course on the 1.3x APS-H 1D series.
I can not imagine anyone buying a 24-70 from Zeiss and not having a A900 or A850 either...
The Canon and Nikon 24-70 f2.8 are quite high volume lenses too. Not so strange, they are just standard zooms. The equivalent of the 17/18-50mm f2.8's on APS-C (well, equivalent focal range wise of course... not aperture wise).