03-22-2011, 12:41 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1300793205' post='7015']
Plus (again): we're not talking about APS-C, but FX <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
-- Markus
[/quote]
Sorry <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> I meant not to adress a APS/FX issue but rather the potential issues of a fast/slow AF and "right" reach for a given application, since 200mm on APS equals 300mm on FX <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> My own decision after my last travel is that next time I'll bear with the added weight.. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Plus (again): we're not talking about APS-C, but FX <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />-- Markus
[/quote]
Sorry <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I meant not to adress a APS/FX issue but rather the potential issues of a fast/slow AF and "right" reach for a given application, since 200mm on APS equals 300mm on FX <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> My own decision after my last travel is that next time I'll bear with the added weight.. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />