02-24-2011, 01:54 PM
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1298551995' post='6318']
Do you suggest to stop gambling and start buying genuine nikon lenses only? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
[/quote]
Nikon lenses CAN be decentered too, with your luck you might just hit a very decentered one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
I would just get the lens that gives you what you want, and let any decentering defects be "repaired" or replaced.
The Sigma 85mm f1.4 for instance is such a lot cheaper, it is worth the try. And a 150mm f2.8 macro from Sigma is a great lens without any Nikon equivalent...
There are many SIgma lenses that behave ok too. My old 18-50mm f2.8 does not have any noticable decentering problems for instance.
Do you suggest to stop gambling and start buying genuine nikon lenses only? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
[/quote]
Nikon lenses CAN be decentered too, with your luck you might just hit a very decentered one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.I would just get the lens that gives you what you want, and let any decentering defects be "repaired" or replaced.
The Sigma 85mm f1.4 for instance is such a lot cheaper, it is worth the try. And a 150mm f2.8 macro from Sigma is a great lens without any Nikon equivalent...
There are many SIgma lenses that behave ok too. My old 18-50mm f2.8 does not have any noticable decentering problems for instance.