01-11-2011, 01:18 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1294640488' post='5400']
Well, the difference is that the manufacturer data shows the naked lens data whereas we (as well as other sites) show the performance of the system (lens + camera + RAW converter).
[/quote]
I understand this. That is why I cannot explain the obervations I made, repeated here again:
- Zeiss data (only lens) show same resolution in corner for 4/3 sensor size.
- Photozone (lens Zeiss + NEX-5 sensor)show much lower corner resolution.
Simplistic conclusion would be that NEX-5 sensor has low corner resolution.
But this is contradicted by a high resolution of Leica45Elamrit+NEX5sensor. It is unlikely that the Elmarit could correct the "simplistically perceived low NEX5 corner resolution".
Am I digging too deep?
Well, the difference is that the manufacturer data shows the naked lens data whereas we (as well as other sites) show the performance of the system (lens + camera + RAW converter).
[/quote]
I understand this. That is why I cannot explain the obervations I made, repeated here again:
- Zeiss data (only lens) show same resolution in corner for 4/3 sensor size.
- Photozone (lens Zeiss + NEX-5 sensor)show much lower corner resolution.
Simplistic conclusion would be that NEX-5 sensor has low corner resolution.
But this is contradicted by a high resolution of Leica45Elamrit+NEX5sensor. It is unlikely that the Elmarit could correct the "simplistically perceived low NEX5 corner resolution".
Am I digging too deep?