12-16-2010, 03:24 AM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1292435490' post='5012']
If you're going to do the format compares, then you can pretty much strike out APS-C, since there is no 30-35mm f/1.2 which would be required if you maintain the equivalent aperture comparison.
[/quote]
Well we have the Nex now... so we can use:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/28...rical.html
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1292435490' post='5012']
Even downgrading to a f/1.4 isn't cheap still. The full format may have a 50mm f/1.8, but you still need the full format sensor behind it, again not so cheap in any fair like for like comparison. And all that still neglects considerations outside of image quality.
[/quote]
This is where it gets difficult to compare. A good 50 1.8 on FF will produce better IQ images than a 25 0.95 on a mFT, even if the number of pixels is the same between the sensors.
GTW
If you're going to do the format compares, then you can pretty much strike out APS-C, since there is no 30-35mm f/1.2 which would be required if you maintain the equivalent aperture comparison.
[/quote]
Well we have the Nex now... so we can use:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/28...rical.html
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[quote name='popo' timestamp='1292435490' post='5012']
Even downgrading to a f/1.4 isn't cheap still. The full format may have a 50mm f/1.8, but you still need the full format sensor behind it, again not so cheap in any fair like for like comparison. And all that still neglects considerations outside of image quality.
[/quote]
This is where it gets difficult to compare. A good 50 1.8 on FF will produce better IQ images than a 25 0.95 on a mFT, even if the number of pixels is the same between the sensors.
GTW