12-15-2010, 05:05 PM
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1292431065' post='5010']
Honestly I don’t want to discuss anything with you.
However I’ll give you a short feedback about your photo work.
1. First Image
a. Taken at infinity
b. Why stitched?
i. Is it sharp? No
ii. Do you need to be sharp No.
c. Bad postprocessing and resizing techniques.
d. I like the sphere in this image
2. Second Image
a. Nice one but bold standard idea. At least here in Netherlands I see regularly such framing and subject.
b. Again image is taken at infinity.
c. I have similar snapshot taken with tokina 100 macro and hoya CPL. My father and mother in low live in Kinderdijk.
3. 3-th image – again taken at infinity.
4. 4-th image?? – messy snapshot image. I should not call it photograph. It can be taken with any camera and lens.
5. 5-th
a. You went closer. It is nice image
b. Definitely not tad sharp. Such sharpens I can achieve with my mobile telephone camera. It could be due to
i. Sloppy resizing techniques
ii. Shaky hands.
iii. Windy weather.
c. It is definitely NOT keeper if the original have such sharpness as represented here.
6. 6-th.
a. Nice image it remembers me my early years of macro photography.
b. Nice composition
c. What is the main subject – I suppose the butterfly.
d. Then Why the butterfly is out of focus.
e. BTW: Why this image cannot be taken with focus breathing lens. The magnification is not big enough.
7. 7-th
a. Nice snapshot but not sharp.
b. It is not keeper. I have thrown hundreds of images like this before I made the right one.
[/quote]
My goodness, you really are a low person on this forum. And your "remarks" are just trash, really sad. That you yourself are mediocre photographer with no artistic sense is ok, but that should not allow you to make such stupid, wrong and silly remarks.
I know that you are from the Netherlands, but that should not excuse your apparent poor understanding of English (I am dutch too, after all).
Notice this phrase: "... the diverse photos I make with my 70-200mm".
Diverse. Key word here. So I show photos that are DIVERSE, from infinity, (the horses), bringing something closer from 20-30 meters (the sheep, the bird on the mill) and, what I COULD NOT DO with the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II, close up nature photos.
The point then being: For ME (and photographers like ME), the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II is not nearly the most suitable portrait range tele zoom. Others, like the Canon 70-200's, the Sony 70-200 and the Tamron 70-200, are more suitable. Why? Because of the considerable focus breathing of the Nikon.
It just is as simple as that.
I will not get into your nonsensical criticisms of my photos, as they are stupid, factually wrong, and just out of a spite that you have shown to me for a long time now, which I am guessing stems from me at times also being critical about certain Nikon products. Sad.
Honestly I don’t want to discuss anything with you.
However I’ll give you a short feedback about your photo work.
1. First Image
a. Taken at infinity
b. Why stitched?
i. Is it sharp? No
ii. Do you need to be sharp No.
c. Bad postprocessing and resizing techniques.
d. I like the sphere in this image
2. Second Image
a. Nice one but bold standard idea. At least here in Netherlands I see regularly such framing and subject.
b. Again image is taken at infinity.
c. I have similar snapshot taken with tokina 100 macro and hoya CPL. My father and mother in low live in Kinderdijk.
3. 3-th image – again taken at infinity.
4. 4-th image?? – messy snapshot image. I should not call it photograph. It can be taken with any camera and lens.
5. 5-th
a. You went closer. It is nice image
b. Definitely not tad sharp. Such sharpens I can achieve with my mobile telephone camera. It could be due to
i. Sloppy resizing techniques
ii. Shaky hands.
iii. Windy weather.
c. It is definitely NOT keeper if the original have such sharpness as represented here.
6. 6-th.
a. Nice image it remembers me my early years of macro photography.
b. Nice composition
c. What is the main subject – I suppose the butterfly.
d. Then Why the butterfly is out of focus.
e. BTW: Why this image cannot be taken with focus breathing lens. The magnification is not big enough.
7. 7-th
a. Nice snapshot but not sharp.
b. It is not keeper. I have thrown hundreds of images like this before I made the right one.
[/quote]
My goodness, you really are a low person on this forum. And your "remarks" are just trash, really sad. That you yourself are mediocre photographer with no artistic sense is ok, but that should not allow you to make such stupid, wrong and silly remarks.
I know that you are from the Netherlands, but that should not excuse your apparent poor understanding of English (I am dutch too, after all).
Notice this phrase: "... the diverse photos I make with my 70-200mm".
Diverse. Key word here. So I show photos that are DIVERSE, from infinity, (the horses), bringing something closer from 20-30 meters (the sheep, the bird on the mill) and, what I COULD NOT DO with the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II, close up nature photos.
The point then being: For ME (and photographers like ME), the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II is not nearly the most suitable portrait range tele zoom. Others, like the Canon 70-200's, the Sony 70-200 and the Tamron 70-200, are more suitable. Why? Because of the considerable focus breathing of the Nikon.
It just is as simple as that.
I will not get into your nonsensical criticisms of my photos, as they are stupid, factually wrong, and just out of a spite that you have shown to me for a long time now, which I am guessing stems from me at times also being critical about certain Nikon products. Sad.