12-13-2010, 12:25 AM
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1291982182' post='4922']
Ok, just out of curiosity:
1. Some NR at long exposure shots would affect your shooting - how?
2. Would it be visible on prints?
3. Did you actually see the NR effect on the images or you're just referring to the FT analysis of the noise distribution?
[/quote]
First of all, I got a DSLR because I wanted to be in control of things. Second of all, I have lenses that resolve lots of detail that get lost when NR is applied.
So:
1. Yes, I wouldn't want NR on any of my RAWs. Manufacturers may have a NoobRAW option to force NR but leave RAW raw.
2 & 3. Yes, NR is visible when the lenses resolve the detail. Doesn't matter whether it's done in camera or in post. How NR works is mathematical and understood... not a mathemagical.
GTW
Ok, just out of curiosity:
1. Some NR at long exposure shots would affect your shooting - how?
2. Would it be visible on prints?
3. Did you actually see the NR effect on the images or you're just referring to the FT analysis of the noise distribution?
[/quote]
First of all, I got a DSLR because I wanted to be in control of things. Second of all, I have lenses that resolve lots of detail that get lost when NR is applied.
So:
1. Yes, I wouldn't want NR on any of my RAWs. Manufacturers may have a NoobRAW option to force NR but leave RAW raw.
2 & 3. Yes, NR is visible when the lenses resolve the detail. Doesn't matter whether it's done in camera or in post. How NR works is mathematical and understood... not a mathemagical.
GTW