Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nikon 28-300 review
#1
Hi markus, a long while ago you posted some sample pics of the Nikon 28-300. What happened to the review? Was the sample bad or did you just encounter time constraints?
#2
Just time constraints, the lens is not a bad one (in the sense that it does not seem to be a bad copy).



Slight shift of priorities, too. The 24-120 VR will come first on FX, for example. Also, finally got a RAW converter for the D7000, at this very moment I'm shooting charts with it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#3
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1291584241' post='4776']

the lens is not a bad one

[/quote]

I guess you meant to say "not a bad zoom" ;D



GTW
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)