[quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1291289216' post='4694']
I believe that the big site, which does not allow links to your site[/quote]
Really? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1291289216' post='4694']But, in my opinion, the very best reviewers should not be afraid of that.
[/quote]
We're certainly not afraid of subjective comments here and there.
But publishing the RAWs? Allow me to be a bit sarcastic: there are lot's of discussions out there already in almost any forum, started by readers having trouble to interpret our published charts ... the processed, interpreted and simplified data. Can you imagine what we'd have to face if we also published the raw data in addition?
It's not up to me to decide, but if it was, my answer would definitely be: no, thanks! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
-- Markus
I believe that the big site, which does not allow links to your site[/quote]
Really? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> [quote name='Tiz' timestamp='1291289216' post='4694']But, in my opinion, the very best reviewers should not be afraid of that.
[/quote]
We're certainly not afraid of subjective comments here and there.
But publishing the RAWs? Allow me to be a bit sarcastic: there are lot's of discussions out there already in almost any forum, started by readers having trouble to interpret our published charts ... the processed, interpreted and simplified data. Can you imagine what we'd have to face if we also published the raw data in addition?
It's not up to me to decide, but if it was, my answer would definitely be: no, thanks! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> -- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com