12-02-2010, 02:07 PM
Just one more comment:
Klaus indicates that you "don't apply any aggressive sharpening (I strongly opposed that approach in the recent K5 discussion) anyway. However, even if we did this would have an impact on the scale only but not on the qualitative validity of the results".
I am neverthelss sometimes puzzled how relevant the differences in resolution are. For instance, what does it tell me that the Panasonic 20mm pencake scores higher than the Pana 14-45 OIS mFT zoom lens? Will the difference be clearly visible in real world images? Is a difference of 100 big or small? Even if you decide not to post RAW images, a processed image of a good test motif would still be VERY helpful.
Klaus indicates that you "don't apply any aggressive sharpening (I strongly opposed that approach in the recent K5 discussion) anyway. However, even if we did this would have an impact on the scale only but not on the qualitative validity of the results".
I am neverthelss sometimes puzzled how relevant the differences in resolution are. For instance, what does it tell me that the Panasonic 20mm pencake scores higher than the Pana 14-45 OIS mFT zoom lens? Will the difference be clearly visible in real world images? Is a difference of 100 big or small? Even if you decide not to post RAW images, a processed image of a good test motif would still be VERY helpful.