11-30-2010, 11:05 PM
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1291156423' post='4615']
Well, there is a reason why it is no longer listed on the main page of LL.
Also, check the forum for the thread on this.
IMO, it wasn't a well written article, with quite a few mistakes, and personally I found it rather disappointing that a well known and respected author actually wrote this piece in the way it was done.
'nuff said.
Kind regards, Wim
[/quote]
Wim, even though you wrote "'nuff said", I'm afraid you did not say anything :/. I did find the article was not well put together (no explanation whatsoever on graph data collection, etc...) but that what it's trying to say could be rather interesting. Or did I misunderstand everything?
DxO still inks to this article and what I could find in the LL forum wasn't really saying anything else than "no explanation". Care to enlighten me? Doesn't have to be a Wim Encyclopedic answer <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
TIA,
S.
Well, there is a reason why it is no longer listed on the main page of LL.
Also, check the forum for the thread on this.
IMO, it wasn't a well written article, with quite a few mistakes, and personally I found it rather disappointing that a well known and respected author actually wrote this piece in the way it was done.
'nuff said.
Kind regards, Wim
[/quote]
Wim, even though you wrote "'nuff said", I'm afraid you did not say anything :/. I did find the article was not well put together (no explanation whatsoever on graph data collection, etc...) but that what it's trying to say could be rather interesting. Or did I misunderstand everything?
DxO still inks to this article and what I could find in the LL forum wasn't really saying anything else than "no explanation". Care to enlighten me? Doesn't have to be a Wim Encyclopedic answer <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />TIA,
S.