11-29-2010, 03:15 PM
[quote name='DenisLV' timestamp='1291041350' post='4565']
Hi,
I'm currently making a little research on zeiss lenses for my 5DMK2.
According to reviews on Photozone Zeiss ZF lenses are much better than ZE. In particular I'm referring to 35,50 and 85mm. Now, I know that zeiss ZF been tested on Nikon's aps-c camera and it could hide some of the issues like vignetting and everything that is not very pretty near the borders of the photo.While ZE lenses been tested on 5DMARK2 and the result were poor compared to Nikon's APS-C?! And were that the real ZE lenses tested with 5DMark2? On the pics you can see that these are actually ZF's with an adapter.
If so, does that mean that I can expect the same results from ZE lenses on canon's full frame?
Hope i didn't brought a lot of confusion (English is not my mothertoung)
[/quote]
We used ZF lenses via adapter - this is also mentioned in the reviews.
However, optically there's no difference compared to the ZEs whatsoever - this is just a different mount.
Hi,
I'm currently making a little research on zeiss lenses for my 5DMK2.
According to reviews on Photozone Zeiss ZF lenses are much better than ZE. In particular I'm referring to 35,50 and 85mm. Now, I know that zeiss ZF been tested on Nikon's aps-c camera and it could hide some of the issues like vignetting and everything that is not very pretty near the borders of the photo.While ZE lenses been tested on 5DMARK2 and the result were poor compared to Nikon's APS-C?! And were that the real ZE lenses tested with 5DMark2? On the pics you can see that these are actually ZF's with an adapter.
If so, does that mean that I can expect the same results from ZE lenses on canon's full frame?
Hope i didn't brought a lot of confusion (English is not my mothertoung)
[/quote]
We used ZF lenses via adapter - this is also mentioned in the reviews.
However, optically there's no difference compared to the ZEs whatsoever - this is just a different mount.