11-28-2010, 07:44 PM
[quote name='Rainer' timestamp='1290972852' post='4536']
This poll is a bit pointless, since to judge things properly, it would take the images twice ...
from the same camera model, once with AA removed, once with its standard AA.
As it is now, you can see images that are quite sharp, but contain a lot of
traces of moire (albeit this sort of images usually does not bring them up
too much) ... most can be repaired in PP, but as well could an image from
a camera with AA be sharpened.
EDIT: By the way ... I voted "acceptable" as well, so one acceptable vote was obviously lost.
[/quote]
I agree with this. My first thought was that the shots are not super-sharp, i.e. you could obtain a similar sharpness with a camera with AA filter, plus great lens and good PP. However if you were to tell me that these hadnt been sharpened in PP then I would be more impressed. Side by side images are required ;-)
This poll is a bit pointless, since to judge things properly, it would take the images twice ...
from the same camera model, once with AA removed, once with its standard AA.
As it is now, you can see images that are quite sharp, but contain a lot of
traces of moire (albeit this sort of images usually does not bring them up
too much) ... most can be repaired in PP, but as well could an image from
a camera with AA be sharpened.
EDIT: By the way ... I voted "acceptable" as well, so one acceptable vote was obviously lost.
[/quote]
I agree with this. My first thought was that the shots are not super-sharp, i.e. you could obtain a similar sharpness with a camera with AA filter, plus great lens and good PP. However if you were to tell me that these hadnt been sharpened in PP then I would be more impressed. Side by side images are required ;-)