11-28-2010, 04:25 PM
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1290956909' post='4521']
Klaus sorry to bother you with this request:
You said the ISo of the k5 is far better than the 7D. What does this mean? is it better when both images are viewd at 100% or ist it still better when both images are printed the same size? I am saking because the 7d seems to resolve a bit more than the K5. This means one could use a bit more noise reduction on the 7d images to end up with the same Iq as the k5 (resolution and noise wide at least). Dr would be differnt though, I am imapiently waiting for your tests redarding this aspect.
[/quote]
If we look at the high ISO studio (not ideal) shots from dpreview, we do NOT see the K7 being "far better" than the 7D/D7000/60D, they all are very much the same (looked at 100% pixel level, which means we do magnify a bit more with the 7D and 60D).
What we do know about the high ISO from the K5 is that it gets some kind of filtering in the RAW data from ISO 3200 and up.
Klaus sorry to bother you with this request:
You said the ISo of the k5 is far better than the 7D. What does this mean? is it better when both images are viewd at 100% or ist it still better when both images are printed the same size? I am saking because the 7d seems to resolve a bit more than the K5. This means one could use a bit more noise reduction on the 7d images to end up with the same Iq as the k5 (resolution and noise wide at least). Dr would be differnt though, I am imapiently waiting for your tests redarding this aspect.
[/quote]
If we look at the high ISO studio (not ideal) shots from dpreview, we do NOT see the K7 being "far better" than the 7D/D7000/60D, they all are very much the same (looked at 100% pixel level, which means we do magnify a bit more with the 7D and 60D).
What we do know about the high ISO from the K5 is that it gets some kind of filtering in the RAW data from ISO 3200 and up.