11-06-2010, 04:57 PM
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1289061463' post='4005']
Has nothing to do with acceptance. It has to do with the credibility of the site. DXo tests are senseless as I have pointed out on the example of the Canon 16-35 lens (Dxo results contradict photzone's test of the same lens,not by marginal difference, but by claiming the lens to have a complete differnt characteristic. (sharpness DEcrease when stopping down vs. Sharpness INcrease when stopping down ) This leads me to conclude that their test are unrelaible and flawed.
I would be very happy if the pentax had this high a dR. It actaully may well have. Its just that DXO is incompetent to tell. When imaging resource, dpreview and maybe photozone had a look at the cam we may know more. Until then we cant tell.
[/quote]
Imaging resource does not do a good job at all, regarding "testing" the IQ and IQ possibilities. The only thing that is a little bit useful from them is the studio RAW files.
DPReview is not all that much better, they do not even know how to test DR, and their noise assessments are failed too.
Photozone does not do a much better job either, if you really want to compare IQ from different camera bodies...
So even after they review, we still can not really tell. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
Has nothing to do with acceptance. It has to do with the credibility of the site. DXo tests are senseless as I have pointed out on the example of the Canon 16-35 lens (Dxo results contradict photzone's test of the same lens,not by marginal difference, but by claiming the lens to have a complete differnt characteristic. (sharpness DEcrease when stopping down vs. Sharpness INcrease when stopping down ) This leads me to conclude that their test are unrelaible and flawed.
I would be very happy if the pentax had this high a dR. It actaully may well have. Its just that DXO is incompetent to tell. When imaging resource, dpreview and maybe photozone had a look at the cam we may know more. Until then we cant tell.
[/quote]
Imaging resource does not do a good job at all, regarding "testing" the IQ and IQ possibilities. The only thing that is a little bit useful from them is the studio RAW files.
DPReview is not all that much better, they do not even know how to test DR, and their noise assessments are failed too.
Photozone does not do a much better job either, if you really want to compare IQ from different camera bodies...
So even after they review, we still can not really tell. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />