11-06-2010, 05:00 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1289062638' post='4008']
Imaging resource does not do a good job at all, regarding "testing" the IQ and IQ possibilities. The only thing that is a little bit useful from them is the studio RAW files.
DPReview is not all that much better, they do not even know how to test DR, and their noise assessments are failed too.
Photozone does not do a much better job either, if you really want to compare IQ from different camera bodies...
So even after they review, we still can not really tell. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
[/quote]
you are right in a way. The best way to evaluate a camera is of course to shoot the same subject, under the same light with all cameras, open the files in one's preferred raw converter, adjust for MP differences and print the pictures. Then you can compare and find the best camera for YOUR workflow.
Imaging resource does not do a good job at all, regarding "testing" the IQ and IQ possibilities. The only thing that is a little bit useful from them is the studio RAW files.
DPReview is not all that much better, they do not even know how to test DR, and their noise assessments are failed too.
Photozone does not do a much better job either, if you really want to compare IQ from different camera bodies...
So even after they review, we still can not really tell. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
[/quote]
you are right in a way. The best way to evaluate a camera is of course to shoot the same subject, under the same light with all cameras, open the files in one's preferred raw converter, adjust for MP differences and print the pictures. Then you can compare and find the best camera for YOUR workflow.