11-13-2010, 05:41 PM
[quote name='jenbenn' timestamp='1289650748' post='4147']
Dpreview has published raw and jpg test shots of d7000, K5 and 60D. What I found intersting is that the d7000 and k5 seem indeed to hold more detail in the shawdos than the 60d . This is however only apprent in the dark box in the photos which contains these wool threads. Otherwise all cameras (except the 50D) look more or less identical, with the D7000 being abit less noisey but also a bit less sharp than the 60D at high iso.[/quote]
Errr... I think many folks are finding the K5 RAW files to be rather soft all the way from ISO 100 to 6400 when compared to the D7000, its closest counterpart. What do you guys think? The D7000 and 60D appear a lot more similar than expected (RAW of course).
Dpreview has published raw and jpg test shots of d7000, K5 and 60D. What I found intersting is that the d7000 and k5 seem indeed to hold more detail in the shawdos than the 60d . This is however only apprent in the dark box in the photos which contains these wool threads. Otherwise all cameras (except the 50D) look more or less identical, with the D7000 being abit less noisey but also a bit less sharp than the 60D at high iso.[/quote]
Errr... I think many folks are finding the K5 RAW files to be rather soft all the way from ISO 100 to 6400 when compared to the D7000, its closest counterpart. What do you guys think? The D7000 and 60D appear a lot more similar than expected (RAW of course).