11-13-2010, 08:50 PM
[quote name='Kunzite' timestamp='1289673301' post='4153']
Unfortunately dpreview's samples cannot be used to judge how much detail a camera can resolve.
For the K-5, the ISO1600 shot is sharper than lower ISO ones; obviously something happened, but I'm afraid this won't be investigated; it's so much easy to just say "K-5 level of detail is behind the competition"... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Of course, the 60D could still have better detail even if all things were equal; those 18MPs are not only for show <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> But I doubt the K-5 lags behind, even for pixel peeping.
[/quote]You think they don't know what they are you? go into the Pentax forum and everybody in there knows everything and dpreview knows nothing
bottom line all three are great cameras.
Unfortunately dpreview's samples cannot be used to judge how much detail a camera can resolve.
For the K-5, the ISO1600 shot is sharper than lower ISO ones; obviously something happened, but I'm afraid this won't be investigated; it's so much easy to just say "K-5 level of detail is behind the competition"... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />Of course, the 60D could still have better detail even if all things were equal; those 18MPs are not only for show <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> But I doubt the K-5 lags behind, even for pixel peeping.[/quote]You think they don't know what they are you? go into the Pentax forum and everybody in there knows everything and dpreview knows nothing
bottom line all three are great cameras.