Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions
#4
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1287118241' post='3637']

Wouldn't the 1.4x TC make more sense because then there'll be more overlap (99-283mm) with the 28-300? [/quote]

No, TC would not be just for academic exercise of comparing to another lens, but rather for practical purposes.



Quote:While some people love their TCs, my recommendation is that if you're going to use one lens with the TC attached most of the time, it's better to get the other lens that doesn't need the TC. TCs are evil in my book <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />

Well, 2xTCIII has excellent opinion for quality.



Quote:And if you care about IQ, why bother with zooms? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />

Are you saying Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 II has poor IQ?
  


Messages In This Thread
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by hwyhobo - 10-13-2010, 08:13 PM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by anyscreenamewilldo - 10-14-2010, 09:43 PM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by genotypewriter - 10-15-2010, 04:50 AM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by hwyhobo - 10-15-2010, 08:29 AM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by hwyhobo - 10-15-2010, 05:58 PM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by Guest - 10-18-2010, 02:24 PM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by Guest - 10-18-2010, 02:24 PM
Nikon 28-300 and comparison to existing solutions - by genotypewriter - 10-18-2010, 11:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)