10-26-2010, 01:58 AM
I have read a lot of forums on this lens and most are happy. I even download images taken with this lens on Nikon mount to see full resolution. All images are sharp, contrasty, and nice background blur which is impossible to get those result with my Canon 70-300mm IS. However I own a bad copy of the Canon, and I decided to sell it for $400 and wait for Tamron 70-300mm VC, but still not arrived.
After I read more forums on Canon's mount, some people complain about its sharpness; they said it was soft especially at 300mm which was softer than the Canon's. I think there are a lot of variations in Canon mount. Even though, I see very impressive images taken with this lens on Canon 5D MkII.
How do you think about variations of this lens in Canon's mount?
After I read more forums on Canon's mount, some people complain about its sharpness; they said it was soft especially at 300mm which was softer than the Canon's. I think there are a lot of variations in Canon mount. Even though, I see very impressive images taken with this lens on Canon 5D MkII.
How do you think about variations of this lens in Canon's mount?