Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ugh, I predict scores for the Nikon 24-120 f/4 VR...
#1
Optical quality: 2 and a half

build: 3 and a half

value: 2



So far the samples I have seen, lots of distortion (typical for long range zoom), mediocre bokeh to downright ugly. Somewhat soft wide open.



I know the lens has not been tested, but I should get mine this week, I suddenly don't feel too excited about anymore. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />



Link to photos of what I am talking about.

[url="http://www.flickr.com/groups/1473165@N20/"]http://www.flickr.com/groups/1473165@N20/[/url]
#2
If you van see from those pic's that the lens is useless, you should get your eyes patented and start a test company with them. Have faith! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' /> Vieux Loup
#3
I would expect a comparable performance than the EF 24-105/4L
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)