09-27-2010, 01:31 PM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1285586834' post='3281']
looks interesting. How about also giving a comparison of the centre portion?
[/quote]
Thanks... in short I'm too lazy to do a test on that <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Mainly because it serves a very little purpose. The systems here are too different to be compared against each other in a standard way, looking at center and corner crops. We already know the center's better than the corners so what I've shown is like the worst-case scenario.
Also, whether we think the 16 is good or bad, there really isn't any other lens that's comparable in size, focal length and speed-wise. But if portability/AF is not a requirement, then you know the absolute best lenses for IQ out there anyway, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
GTW
looks interesting. How about also giving a comparison of the centre portion?
[/quote]
Thanks... in short I'm too lazy to do a test on that <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Mainly because it serves a very little purpose. The systems here are too different to be compared against each other in a standard way, looking at center and corner crops. We already know the center's better than the corners so what I've shown is like the worst-case scenario.Also, whether we think the 16 is good or bad, there really isn't any other lens that's comparable in size, focal length and speed-wise. But if portability/AF is not a requirement, then you know the absolute best lenses for IQ out there anyway, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW