[wim]

[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1285594303' post='3288']

Thanks... in short I'm too lazy to do a test on that <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Mainly because it serves a very little purpose. The systems here are too different to be compared against each other in a standard way, looking at center and corner crops. We already know the center's better than the corners so what I've shown is like the worst-case scenario.



Also, whether we think the 16 is good or bad, there really isn't any other lens that's comparable in size, focal length and speed-wise. But if portability/AF is not a requirement, then you know the absolute best lenses for IQ out there anyway, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



GTW

[/quote]

Yes, if portability isn't, it's L all the way, if AF isn't, than it's TS-E 17L, TS-24L II, TS-E 45, MP-E 65, TS-E 90 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.



Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />