09-28-2010, 11:54 AM
@ quadn : Well, I've seen here a 25-28% difference with Sony undercutting the two big guys, and I guess it'a a conception, even if flawed, that for a prosumer price you get roughly the equivalent of a D3X that stirs the emotions <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Anyways I wonder why is it that Sony is lagging so much in terms of SLR sales, behind Canon and Nikon, maybe it's just that they were too late to the party, for most photogs the cost of swapping the whole system is just too much.. I didn't know though that the sensor resolution has no real impact on it's price <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
' /> Anyways I wonder why is it that Sony is lagging so much in terms of SLR sales, behind Canon and Nikon, maybe it's just that they were too late to the party, for most photogs the cost of swapping the whole system is just too much.. I didn't know though that the sensor resolution has no real impact on it's price <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />