[Reinier]

Hello Joachim,



Thanks for your welcome!



Sorry for the late reply, but I spend some time thinking what to do next.I could go for another camera, but that will cost me more in the end than on tele (zoom) lens. ALthough I would love to have a 60D because of the

articulated screen. I can not bend very well, so this would be a nice bonus. I don't understand why SLR's from Canon and Nikon didn't have these screens before, my old Canon G3 from 7 years old has it already. I think it has to do with marketing purposes, so they have some new features in store when the run out of the pixel war.



By the way what does FT means?





Best wishes,



Reinier











[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1284672451' post='2865']

Hi Reinier,



good to see you back. You seem to have a size issue, judging by your comments on the 100-400. Die you think about getting a different camera? By using a high density APSC camera like 7D or the new 60D and cropping the image, you would squeeze more out of your existing lenses.



[size="2"]The rationale behind the above is, on 4-3rd a 200mm is equivalent to 400mm. The 7D has a pixel density which is higher than the newly announced Olympus E-5. I am actually wondering whether the latest 16 to 17MP APSC cameras are the last nail in the coffin of that benefit of FT, that you get more fine detail of a given lens.[/size]



[size="2"]Joachim[/size]

[/quote]