08-31-2010, 06:41 PM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1283279451' post='2380']
They were leaked to rumour yesterday taking off the edge of the official announcement. Samples of the 75-300 don't look that good to me. Aperture seems rather slow. The only reason I can think of for that is to reduce diameter of the lens. And if it wasn't for the recently announced Canon 70-300L I wouldn't know of a more expensive 7x-300 lens.
[/quote]
Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G SSM <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
And of course the compact Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM.
And then there were/are the Zeiss/Contax Vario-Sonnar [color="#FF0000"]T*[/color] 70-300mm F4-5.6, and the Zeiss Vario-Sonnar [color="#FF0000"]T*[/color] 100-300mm f4.5.
But yes, you of course are right. It is quite expensive.
They were leaked to rumour yesterday taking off the edge of the official announcement. Samples of the 75-300 don't look that good to me. Aperture seems rather slow. The only reason I can think of for that is to reduce diameter of the lens. And if it wasn't for the recently announced Canon 70-300L I wouldn't know of a more expensive 7x-300 lens.
[/quote]
Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G SSM <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />And of course the compact Canon EF 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 DO IS USM.
And then there were/are the Zeiss/Contax Vario-Sonnar [color="#FF0000"]T*[/color] 70-300mm F4-5.6, and the Zeiss Vario-Sonnar [color="#FF0000"]T*[/color] 100-300mm f4.5.
But yes, you of course are right. It is quite expensive.