09-01-2010, 09:12 AM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1283290306' post='2390']
I agree, with you on the samples. They are full of artefacts - most likely to high JPEG compression.
[/quote]
The 2nd photo has a problem with the optics (how is that called, when a light area starts to "shine" into neighbouring areas?), look at the finger tips/nails for instance.
Both of them are severely hampered by very strong/bad chromatic noise reduction, it is not so much JPEG artifacts. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
I agree, with you on the samples. They are full of artefacts - most likely to high JPEG compression.
[/quote]
The 2nd photo has a problem with the optics (how is that called, when a light area starts to "shine" into neighbouring areas?), look at the finger tips/nails for instance.
Both of them are severely hampered by very strong/bad chromatic noise reduction, it is not so much JPEG artifacts. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />