08-26-2010, 02:02 PM
[quote name='oneguy' timestamp='1282804615' post='2183']
Yes, I did, and both got 3.5 star for optical quality, but Sony lens is better build and works with video with silent AF. Canon is all plastic and doesn't.[/quote]
Klauss' optical quality scores are based entirely on various aspects of lens designs.
In real use, distortion, chromatic aberration and vignetting are most EASILY corrected in post-processing, so the only criteria worth considering are resolution, flare and bokeh. Since the latter two aspects are not presented, the only aspect left is resolution. If you miss out the details, you can never recover them.
Now, look at 18, 24-28 mm and 55 mm. Examine performance at border/extreme relative to the center. Take off your fanboyz glasses and stare at the optical results.
Yes, I did, and both got 3.5 star for optical quality, but Sony lens is better build and works with video with silent AF. Canon is all plastic and doesn't.[/quote]
Klauss' optical quality scores are based entirely on various aspects of lens designs.
In real use, distortion, chromatic aberration and vignetting are most EASILY corrected in post-processing, so the only criteria worth considering are resolution, flare and bokeh. Since the latter two aspects are not presented, the only aspect left is resolution. If you miss out the details, you can never recover them.
Now, look at 18, 24-28 mm and 55 mm. Examine performance at border/extreme relative to the center. Take off your fanboyz glasses and stare at the optical results.