[Brightcolours]

[quote name='wim' timestamp='1282827478' post='2214']

As long as you tell us what you decided on, and why. I 'd really like to know now <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.



And that 60D does look darn good, actually <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />. However, it should have been FF iMO <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />. <GDR>



Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

[/quote]

Yes, that 60D DOES look darn good.



I never considered a 20D (350D) or 450D (450D) because of size. Now they shrunk that line!

And with a swivel LCD that actually makes sense (3" and side swivel, not that silly Nikon bottom hinged thing of the D5000 or the limited movements of the Sony's), it gets to be a might interesting camera for my photography.



And then there is that new 70-300 L... expensive, yes. Super sharp, apparently so. And contrasty.

Only downside I can see for that lens is the focus breathing (gives the same magnification at 1.2m to my 70-200mm f4 L USM), I would have liked it to give more magnification. But other than that... wow, this lens will find its way into my camera bag somewhere in future.