07-15-2010, 03:29 PM
Hi Rainer,
[quote name='Rainer' date='15 July 2010 - 12:22 PM' timestamp='1279189374' post='1021']
This is the case for some lenses ... but not for all.
The Tamron 17-50 for instance does never fill the image of a FF camera. (Regardless which focal length you use and which aperture).
[/quote]
Yes, you're right. Many lenses do however, especially the (U)WA zooms. I guess it is a matter of trial and error <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
Kind regards, Wim
[quote name='Rainer' date='15 July 2010 - 12:22 PM' timestamp='1279189374' post='1021']
This is the case for some lenses ... but not for all.
The Tamron 17-50 for instance does never fill the image of a FF camera. (Regardless which focal length you use and which aperture).
[/quote]
Yes, you're right. Many lenses do however, especially the (U)WA zooms. I guess it is a matter of trial and error <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....