07-06-2010, 05:31 PM
[quote name='Pinhole' date='06 July 2010 - 04:21 PM' timestamp='1278429705' post='856']
But the Nikon 14-24 isn't much more expensive, is it? And from what I've read, it seems to be the leader of the pack in this range right now.
[/quote]
When it eventually reaches stores, I suppose it will be less expensive than MSRP and cheaper enough to make a good alternative to the Nikkor. A concern though is that it gets a bulged filter unfriendly front element at 16mm while Canon and Nikon typically don't at these focal length.
But the Nikon 14-24 isn't much more expensive, is it? And from what I've read, it seems to be the leader of the pack in this range right now.
[/quote]
When it eventually reaches stores, I suppose it will be less expensive than MSRP and cheaper enough to make a good alternative to the Nikkor. A concern though is that it gets a bulged filter unfriendly front element at 16mm while Canon and Nikon typically don't at these focal length.