08-22-2010, 06:08 PM
[quote name='michaelgruen' timestamp='1282489957' post='2026']
Would you consider it as a significant improvement (resolution, CAs) compared to the 18-50 2.8 EX MACRO ?
Regards
Michael
[/quote]
What is "significant" ? A decent copy of the old 18-50 is certainly a very good lens.
The 17-50 is better but whether the difference matters to you is hard to tell from this side of the screen.
Would you consider it as a significant improvement (resolution, CAs) compared to the 18-50 2.8 EX MACRO ?
Regards
Michael
[/quote]
What is "significant" ? A decent copy of the old 18-50 is certainly a very good lens.
The 17-50 is better but whether the difference matters to you is hard to tell from this side of the screen.