06-21-2010, 08:20 PM
Of course, EVERY review from Lloyd Chambers shows the edge going to Nikon. No idea why people take him as serious as they do. A bit tiresome, the biased stuff from Lloyd. But to everyone his own, right?
[quote name='SimonC' date='21 June 2010 - 05:52 PM' timestamp='1277139168' post='641']
Lloyd Chambers reviewed both the Nikon 24G and the Canon 24LII (http://www.diglloyd.com/diglloyd/index.html) separately. His site is a paid subscription; however, he does a very competent job of comparing the 24G with the rest of the Nikon lens lineup. Comparisons with the Canon 24LII show a different story than the link you gave above, with the edge going to the Nikon, esp. border and vignetting performance.
cheers,
Simon
[/quote]
[quote name='SimonC' date='21 June 2010 - 05:52 PM' timestamp='1277139168' post='641']
Lloyd Chambers reviewed both the Nikon 24G and the Canon 24LII (http://www.diglloyd.com/diglloyd/index.html) separately. His site is a paid subscription; however, he does a very competent job of comparing the 24G with the rest of the Nikon lens lineup. Comparisons with the Canon 24LII show a different story than the link you gave above, with the edge going to the Nikon, esp. border and vignetting performance.
cheers,
Simon
[/quote]