Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G
#8
[quote name='Sylvain' date='15 June 2010 - 04:26 AM' timestamp='1276540004' post='511']

Is the front element shape really a function of the maximum aperture? Although designed for four thirds, pana & oly 7-14 f/4 lenses are similarly shaped. Same with sigma 8-16 & 12-24 lenses (wider of course but still).

If so, complaining about this shape seems like complaining about a FWD car having a four wheels transmission.

[/quote]



Good point about the 7-14s, Sylvain. I was mainly referring to how the Sigma 12-24 goes down to 12mm without having a front element as large as the 14-24, because of its slower max f number. The shape of course has to be there for the FOV.



GTW
  


Messages In This Thread
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 05:25 AM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 01:02 PM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-14-2010, 11:53 PM
New Review/Comparison - Canon 24 1.4L II vs. Nikon 24 1.4G - by genotypewriter - 06-15-2010, 12:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)