02-16-2017, 12:15 PM
I thought that in cameras with in camera IS the imager physically moved to counteract the shaking motion of the camera. Is "digital image stabilization something a little more phony? Like, ha, ha, "Digital Zoom"? I'm pretty sure with Oly MFT, and Sony they use a sensor shift method. I'm not quick to laugh at sensor shift stabilization for a couple of reasons. Namely reduced elements and sharper, cheaper lenses. I have to admit I don't understand the in lens form of stabilization. I had imagined it was gyroscopic, but lens diagrams show lens elements that are stabilizing.
The only functional thing I care about stabilization is that Canon IS allows you to see a steady image in the viewer, where other systems cause you to see a shaky or jumping image that does not reflect the state of the capture. Again, my impression is that Oly MFT imager shift stabilization is 100% legit. And even adds addition high resolution mode.
So in Pentax IS not legit, somehow? I've liked the K1 camera in reviews. Not the same as using one, I guess! Oh, wait, the K01 is not the same camera, right?
Is model club another way of saying stripper bar?
The only functional thing I care about stabilization is that Canon IS allows you to see a steady image in the viewer, where other systems cause you to see a shaky or jumping image that does not reflect the state of the capture. Again, my impression is that Oly MFT imager shift stabilization is 100% legit. And even adds addition high resolution mode.
So in Pentax IS not legit, somehow? I've liked the K1 camera in reviews. Not the same as using one, I guess! Oh, wait, the K01 is not the same camera, right?
Is model club another way of saying stripper bar?