Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM
#11
No worries, Rover, I don't mind at all, in fact I'm really glad for your's (and other's) hints, very welcome!

-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#12
Quote:Well, not sure that's going to happen soon (we haven't discussed it internally so far though). However, if I had to choose a high res system for myself (and if Nikon doesn't come up with a higher res body this year I might have to), the Fuji could be tempting.


-- Markus
 

Let me know if you do decide to switch to GFX, I may have an idea on how to get you one for a more reasonable price Wink
#13
Apparently, you got it all wrong. Should've said it's the best lens ever.

 

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/24-70mm-g...ks-either/

#14
Quote:Apparently, you got it all wrong. Should've said it's the best lens ever.

 

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/24-70mm-g...ks-either/
<ROFL>

 

Then there is the comment about PZ, specifically Klaus, being biased against Sony <ROFL>.

 

Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
#15
When LensRentals tests a lens, it's "oh you can't put 10 lenses on a testing bench, you have to do real photography". When Photozone does it, it's "they got a single bad copy and now giving the lens a bad name". 

#16
Added near-center values.

#17
Quote:Added near-center values.
 

Now they'll say that instead of admitting your mistake, you added more values that humiliate the glorious Sony GM lens that is the best 24-70mm lens ever made by anyone.
#18
You can't change reality. numbers are numbers.

That's what makes photozone such an unbiased and reliable source.

Once again thanks Klaus for the excellent effort.
#19
Quote:You can't change reality. numbers are numbers.

That's what makes photozone such an unbiased and reliable source.

Once again thanks Klaus for the excellent effort.
I would always be careful what I measure. Astrology and economics use numbers too. ;-)

 

Actually I don't understand the fuzz, the review was quite positive. It's a quite usable lens with some drawbacks but nothing you cannot work around.
#20
Quote:I would always be careful what I measure. Astrology and economics use numbers too. ;-)
 

:lol:

 

You don't want to say, they're not accurate? All the horoscopes I read are precise, it depends just from the view you take.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)