Posts: 7,950
Threads: 1,830
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 2,665
Threads: 582
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
15
Weird they have 35 40 50mm serie SE what's the point of having
35 and 40mm ???
BTW they have nothing between 21 and 35 mm in the other serie as well
Posts: 7,950
Threads: 1,830
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
04-17-2020, 12:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-17-2020, 12:56 PM by Klaus.)
As far as I can tell, the 40 and 50 share the optical design with the non-SE series.
The 35 has the same design as the 35mm f/1.2 III VM
The SEs are more light-weight and quite a bit more affordable.
It makes me wonder whether SE=plastic...
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
04-17-2020, 07:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2020, 08:06 AM by Brightcolours.)
I prefer the OVF, so won't trade my 6D for RF mount any time soon. And I have EF-M.
So, no RF for me. Even if I would not prefer OVF, the funds needed for EOS R + 50mm f1.2 + 35mm f1.8 + standard zoom and then just adapting the rest, lack.
Posts: 7,950
Threads: 1,830
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
Huuuh, freakish ...
Albeit I've to say that many Voigtlanders are somewhat overrated. You feel the mechanical quality and are carried away.
The APO-Lanthars are as awesome as it gets but the standard lineup is a hit and miss I think.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji