Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
(07-29-2020, 05:59 PM)Klaus Wrote: Inconclusive - these images are just way too small (2 megapixels ...)
Nice shots though (I mean the quality of the work)
Very true that you can't judge sharpness from these 2.1mp images. But at least it does show that if not used by an incompetent snapshot clown, apparently you can nail focus with them, and actually make nice images.
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
07-29-2020, 08:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2020, 08:21 PM by Brightcolours.)
Dude, you are odd indeed. You posted a reply, it was about your internet being bogged down by people canceling their orders for that RF 600mm f11. That was either a joke, or trolling?
I joked back that it was caused by interest in the Nikon Z5.
So what exactly is your beef? I do not get you much, lately. By all means, block my posts if that makes you feel better. But I do wonder what is going on on your side... And I certainly have not called you any names, except "Dave".The only "name calling" I have done is calling Tony and Chelsea "mixed bag Tony" and "mixed bag Female Tony" after yet another botched video by them.
Posts: 7,425
Threads: 1,646
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
34
07-29-2020, 09:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-30-2020, 03:02 AM by Klaus.)
Booah, ey, it is possible to ignore messages ... why was this all escalating again?
Thread closed.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji