Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ?
#10
People can shoot whatever they want. I really don't care.


But if the topic is about JPEG and someone needs to say "I shoot 100% RAW and I don't understand why people are shooting JPEG" then I'm gonna tell them that they need to post their opinions in another thread.


Instead of rubbishing JPEG why not try for yourself. I am certain you will be surprised.


For some strange reason there seems to be this train of thought that JPEG files can't be worked on. You can do a lot!


Not as much as a RAW file, obviously, but if you have captured the entire dynamic range you can do wonders.


And with modern bodies like the D800 the dynamic range is really impressive, especially when used with ADL.
  


Messages In This Thread
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:28 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 10:54 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-18-2016, 02:25 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 03:53 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 05:16 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 06:05 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:39 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 06:55 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-19-2016, 07:49 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 01:30 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-22-2016, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)