Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ?
#12
Quote:Well, i almost always shoot exclusively RAW, I can use them almost like JPGs and whenever I need JPG files it is easy to extract.

However I surely need good camera JPG, when I have to deliver prints or give the files same day. Also note that OEM raw converter uses same JPG engine as the camera so when the camera has good JPG you will expect also good jpg files out of the RAW files.

With storage media prices that became dirt cheap, always having the RAW files isn't a bad idea.
It is incorrect, to assume that OEM RAW converters use the same "JPEG engine" as the camera does. At least for Canon, that certainly is NOT true. I doubt that it is true for most other manufacturers. 
  


Messages In This Thread
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:28 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 10:54 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-18-2016, 02:25 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 03:53 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 05:16 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 06:05 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Brightcolours - 11-18-2016, 07:23 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:39 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 06:55 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-19-2016, 07:49 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 01:30 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-22-2016, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)