Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ?
#21
It is as if people do not understand what 100% means.

 

100% means EVERY SINGLE shot you have ever taken.

 

If you shot EVERY SINGLE image in RAW+JPEG you have still shot JPEG.

 

You have not shot 100% RAW!

 

But when someone says "NOT ONE JPEG IMAGE HAS HIT MY CARD” you are making an empty, ridiculous boast.

 

I understand completely that people shoot 80, 90, maybe even 99% in RAW.

 

But to suggest that you have not ONCE taken an image in JPEG, for example your next door neighbour's cat is plain delusional.

 

Oh, about that guy who shoots 100% in RAW and in M mode? He is also the same guy who says that every single shot he makes is wide-open. It is just beneath him to stop down, even just once. Yeah, right.
  


Messages In This Thread
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:28 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 10:54 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Guest - 11-18-2016, 02:25 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 03:53 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 05:16 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-18-2016, 06:05 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-18-2016, 09:39 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 06:55 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-19-2016, 07:49 AM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by Studor13 - 11-19-2016, 01:30 PM
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - by davidmanze - 11-22-2016, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)