Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 USM L III
#8
Quote:I don't know why I am not at all tempted by a full frame ultrawide.

Now I understand why Tokina had to make their 16-28 big and heavy with a protruding front element.

APS-C offers you much more often needed DOF a more dramatic perspective,way cheaper prices and much lighter alternative.

3+EV vignetting is the least to say unacceptable.
Losing sight of equivalence again.

 

To get an equivalent lens on APS-C, you are talking about 10-22mm f1.75 lens. Wanna bet on how vignetting for the 10mm f1.8 end would be on on APS-C?

 

You do not get more DOF on APS-C either, when you set equivalent settings. So, APS-C does not have a DOF advantage, nor will it vignet lens at equivalent settings.

Nor will it give more dramatic perspectives.

 

Just set your EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III to 16 mm and f13 and you get the same of less vignetting as the APS-C lens at 10mm f8, and the same DOF.

You can not set the APS-C lens to 10mm and f1.8 though, and that is where the FF lens has the advantage (when needed). 
  


Messages In This Thread
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 USM L III - by davidmanze - 11-13-2016, 02:30 AM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 USM L III - by Brightcolours - 11-13-2016, 07:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)