[Kunzite]

Boy, I have to point out your lies?
You said:

The product page was not up when I wrote that, and now it is we can see it renders nicely, like the Sony does.

"that" being yesterday at 5:42PM:

This particular Sony renders really well for 20mm. Yet you bash it, and claim the Pentax is "special" even though not even a single sample image has been published.

Of course, Pentax had the product page with the samples.
It was just a hastily made up and completely gratuitous lie, you pretending that I haven't seen any sample. And it turned against you.

Yeah, you are comparing wrong as the much cheaper (almost 1/3rd of the price Sony 20mm f1.8)

almost 1/3rd of the price is a lie.

Did Sony make a lens that relies on software corrections? (no...)

yes it does. You're lying.

 and I doubt this Toki... I mean Pentax (sorry for the typo)

another lie.

Your attack on this Sony (and Nikkor)
[...]Yet you bash it

another lie.
As who's doing the bashing:
- you are on a Pentax section
- making claims against Pentax products
- by saying Sony and Nikon products are oh so great and 1/3rd of the price
- by denying that the D FA 21mm might have that special rendering described in their product pages and shown in the samples provided
- by constantly launching jabs at Pentax (about precise AF, user base and so on)
And for me "attacking":
- I didn't introduce these foreign lenses on this topic
- I never said they're bad in any way
- the worst I said was to call them "pedestrian"

---

No one is "bashing" the Pentax (only criticising the price, and making fun of the nonsensical "Limited" moniker)...

And obviously this is another lie. You are bashing Pentax. Not just on this thread.
You're even admitting to it in the same line... "making fun of the nonsensical "Limited" moniker"... why? Why "making fun" of a moniker? Why "making fun" of Pentax at all?

It's not like you wanted to know the origin and meaning of the Limited name; because then you'd have asked. You didn't ask. You "made fun".

You low quality troll.