01-21-2022, 07:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2022, 08:47 AM by Brightcolours.)
I know that they don't do it for what you say the reason is, Dave.
If you put a red image in place of any of the 60 60Hz image feed, you will not see the red image. That is how fast 60Hz is, and how "slow" your vision is. Thinking that you may frame differently or miss a moment with 60Hz refresh rate is bonkers. If there is an essential frame between 60 per second frames, in all probability you never saw it anyway. Let alone in 120 or 240 frames per second.
Do you know what your (or rather, a human's, not specifically your) reaction time is between seeing something and then moving a muscle (like moving the camera, or pressing a button)? Between half a second and a bit above a quarter of a second. So if keeping a moving subject in the frame depends on 1/60 of a second or even smaller, you never will have a subject in your images.
And, in that reaction time, 20 to 30 images have passed before your finger could blink. And yet, you imagine that somehow half of 1/60th of a second or a quarter of 1/60th of a second will impact the frames you capture. 30 frames or 30.5 frames... that is not the issue. That needs a rethink, me thinks... And drinks don't help rethinks in a meaningful way....
The lag you have read about in the past was the lag between taking the video and the showing of the video, with longer processing times causing the delay. It was not about 60Hz frame rates.
If you put a red image in place of any of the 60 60Hz image feed, you will not see the red image. That is how fast 60Hz is, and how "slow" your vision is. Thinking that you may frame differently or miss a moment with 60Hz refresh rate is bonkers. If there is an essential frame between 60 per second frames, in all probability you never saw it anyway. Let alone in 120 or 240 frames per second.
Do you know what your (or rather, a human's, not specifically your) reaction time is between seeing something and then moving a muscle (like moving the camera, or pressing a button)? Between half a second and a bit above a quarter of a second. So if keeping a moving subject in the frame depends on 1/60 of a second or even smaller, you never will have a subject in your images.
And, in that reaction time, 20 to 30 images have passed before your finger could blink. And yet, you imagine that somehow half of 1/60th of a second or a quarter of 1/60th of a second will impact the frames you capture. 30 frames or 30.5 frames... that is not the issue. That needs a rethink, me thinks... And drinks don't help rethinks in a meaningful way....
The lag you have read about in the past was the lag between taking the video and the showing of the video, with longer processing times causing the delay. It was not about 60Hz frame rates.