02-21-2022, 09:26 AM
Thanks for pointing out the typos, I just corrected them. I really shouldn't publish anything late in the evening when I am already out of energy for even basic proof-reading 
Well, "only" 4.25* because of the non-circular bokeh highlights and most of all the resolution wide open. I see the lens a tad below the Z 50/1.8, which got 4.5* on FX.
And, yes, I am probably very critical when it comes to the ratings. I can already hear the yellow fever fanboys cry about the ratings when we come to the consumer zooms and the non-S primes

Well, "only" 4.25* because of the non-circular bokeh highlights and most of all the resolution wide open. I see the lens a tad below the Z 50/1.8, which got 4.5* on FX.
And, yes, I am probably very critical when it comes to the ratings. I can already hear the yellow fever fanboys cry about the ratings when we come to the consumer zooms and the non-S primes

Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com