10-23-2023, 03:14 PM
(10-23-2023, 12:44 AM)Klaus Wrote: I suppose FF was never on the books for EF-M. Looking back, I'd rather see it as a competition for MFT and Nikon 1.
This also explained the miniature size of the EF-M bodies. Technically, it was or could have been superior to MTF/Nikon 1 due to the bigger sensor size.
Exactly this.
I was considering getting an EF-M system, but I already had and have an extensive MFT system setup, including a bunch of adapters and speedboosters for EF, Leica, Olympus and a bunch of other brands of lenses, and for me the size en lens options including the ones I own was vast, and superior to the EF-M system.
Combining that with the rendering Oly lenses and bodies do, very similar to Canon, why bother and loose a lot of money by switching. So I stuck with it, and am stil happy with Pen-F, EM-II, a bunch of lenses and my speed boosters for EF ....
Basically, for me it was too little, too late, and still too big, for my purposes anyway.
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....